Plato and Heidegger by Francisco J. Gonzalez

Plato and Heidegger by Francisco J. Gonzalez

Author:Francisco J. Gonzalez
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: Penn State University Press


C. Conclusion: Heidegger’s Orthodoxy

With the critique of Plato for failing to think truth and un-truth as belonging together, Heidegger is only returning to the thesis with which he introduced his reading of the Theaetetus. There he argues that there is a discrepancy between the Greek conceptions of falsehood and truth, shown by the fact that the Greek word for falsehood (ψεῦδoς) and the Greek word for truth (ἀλήθεια) have completely different origins. Ψεῦδoς, Heidegger proceeds to argue, does not simply mean “concealment” (Verborgenheit) but rather “distortion” (Verdrehung) (136; or Verstellen), that is, not simply concealing a thing, but presenting it in such a way as to misrepresent it. But then which of the two different phenomena expressed by ἀλήθεια and ψεῦδoς, that is, unconcealment and distortion, comes to define the other? Heidegger clearly states his answer and his overriding thesis in the following passage, which, on account of its importance, merits being cited at length:

In the first place let us firmly maintain this: with the emergence of ψεῦδoς (distortion [die Verdrehung]) as the opposite [Gegenbegriff] of ἀλήθεια, ἀλήθεια as unconcealing [Entbergen] takes the orientation for its meaning from ψεύδεσθαι and comes to mean the same as ἀ-ψευδεῖν, transforms itself into the opposite of distorting [Verdrehen] (not-distorting). Through this noteworthy juxtaposition, ἀληθεύειν loses its fundamental meaning [Grundbedeutung] and becomes uprooted from the fundamental experience itself [Grunderfahrung selbst] out of which unconcealment [die Unverborgenheit] was understood. In this way ἀλήθεια moves into an opposition to the kind of concealing [Verbergen] that is a covering-up [Verdecken] and distorting [Verstellen], and not simply to concealment [Verborgenheit] and concealing [Verbergung] as such, but rather to distortion [Verdrehung], which perhaps has within itself the moment of concealment [Verborgenheit], but without this moment emerging [welches aber nicht herauskommt]. This covering-up [Verdecken] (distorting [Verdrehen]) is thereby initially in a position of combating [Abwehrstellung gegen] uncovering [das Aufdecken] (making-unconcealed); “uncovering” thus receives the meaning of not-distorting [nicht-verstellen], not-hiding [nicht-verstecken], hitting upon [treffen],—which is something other than what came before: simply and for the first time tearing what is concealed [Verborgenes] out of its concealment [der Verborgenheit]. (138)



Download



Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.